YouTube Guru Scam & Predatory Course Risk Calculator
Screen high-ticket coaching programs and passive income courses against 9 deceptive marketing indicators codified under FTC Section 5 guidelines.
[ REAL-TIME RISK METRIC ]
Forensic Scoring Model & Statutory Violation Mapping
The calculator operates via a weighted linear sum model derived from FTC enforcement precedents against business opportunity fraud and deceptive income marketing.
RiskIndex = ∑ [ w(i) × x(i) ] (i = 1 ... 9, x(i) ∈ {0, 1}, Max = 100)Where coefficients w(i) denote statutory culpability under Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. § 45) and the Telemarketing Sales Rule.
| ID | Category | Weight | Governing Regulation | Statutory Enforcement Remedy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01_guarantee | Guaranteed Income Outcome | 15 pts | FTC Act § 5(a) & 16 C.F.R. § 437 (BizOpps Rule) | Full consumer restitution & civil penalties up to $51,744/violation |
| 02_refund_trap | Unconscionable Refund Barrier | 15 pts | FTC Negative Option Rule & Restatement of Contracts § 208 | Chargeback liability via card network dispute resolution |
| 03_upsell | Bait-and-Switch Funnel Upgrades | 12 pts | 16 C.F.R. Part 238 (Guides Against Bait Advertising) | Injunctive relief and administrative cease-and-desist orders |
| 04_anonymous | Undisclosed Corporate Identity | 12 pts | CAN-SPAM Act § 5 & State Corporate Registration Laws | Piercing the corporate veil; individual personal liability |
| 05_syndicated | Fabricated/Gated Testimonials | 10 pts | FTC Revised Endorsement Guides (16 C.F.R. § 255) | Strict liability for fake influencer/customer endorsements |
| 06_no_stats | Omission of Typical Results | 10 pts | 16 C.F.R. § 437.4 (Earnings Claim Document Disclosure) | Mandatory affirmative disclosure violations |
| 07_fake_proof | Gross Revenue as Profit Proof | 10 pts | 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Federal Wire Fraud Statute) | Criminal prosecution and seizure of illicit profits |
| 08_urgency | Artificial Scarcity Countdown | 8 pts | FTC Dark Patterns Policy Statement (Oct 2021) | Enforcement against deceptive choice architecture |
| 09_scraped | Plagiarized Open-Source Assets | 8 pts | 17 U.S.C. § 501 (Copyright Infringement) | Statutory damages up to $150,000 per willful work |
Audited Case Studies & Dispute Resolution FAQ
Real-world audit breakdowns illustrating typical deceptive course setups and effective recovery routes.
| Scenario Pattern | Flagged Indicators | Risk Index | Severity | Recommended Remedy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-Ticket 'Mastermind' | Guaranteed Income (15) + Refund Barrier (15) + Upsell Funnel (12) + Fake Testimonials (10) | 72 ~ 85 pts | 🚨 Severe Predator | Immediate FCBA billing dispute filing with card issuing bank. Copy transcripts and pitch recordings to FTC ReportFraud. |
| Mid-Tier 'Sprint Bootcamp' | Artificial Scarcity (8) + Omission of Typical Stats (10) + Upsell (12) | 30 ~ 45 pts | ⚠️ Moderate Risk | Request formal syllabus and audited CPA statements of typical student earnings prior to checkout. |
| Entry-Level Starter Guide | Plagiarized Assets (8) | 8 pts | Low Scrutiny | Verify against open-source GitHub repositories or free tutorials before purchasing. |
■Consumer Legal Recourse FAQ
Q1. What is the statutory deadline for initiating an FCBA billing dispute?
Under the Fair Credit Billing Act (15 U.S.C. § 1666), you have 60 days from the postmark date of the credit card statement containing the erroneous or deceptive charge to send written dispute notice to your card issuer.
Q2. Does signing an online 'Terms of Service' waive my statutory chargeback rights?
No. Federal statutory protections and card network operating rules (Visa Core Rules / Mastercard Rules) supersede merchant-side adhesion contracts. Misrepresentation of goods or services invalidates waiver provisions.
Q3. What evidence is most effective when disputing with Chase, Amex, or Citi?
Provide video timestamp transcripts showing guaranteed earnings promises, promotional webinars, and documented proof of your refund request and the merchant's refusal.
Q4. Can the creator sue me for defamation if I file a dispute or leave a review?
Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Under the Consumer Review Fairness Act (15 U.S.C. § 45b), non-disparagement gag clauses in form contracts are illegal and unenforceable nationwide.
Q5. Does YouTuber Sniper charge fees or earn affiliate commissions from course reviews?
Zero. YouTuber Sniper is a 100% independent citizen forensic archive. We do not accept sponsor fees, affiliate deals, or vendor incentives.